From respirator lung to
ventilator induced lung injury, we have travelled a long distance from the
concept of barotrauma-volutrauma to stress-strain. Stress is defined as equal
and opposite force developed in a material, when exposed to external force, while
strain is change in the area or volume from baseline, brought about in this
process. Stress-strain relationship is a function of material property, solid,
viscous or viscoelastic.
Current strategy of mechanical
ventilation as endorsed by ARDS net, is limiting the tidal volume and plateau
airway pressure to 6 ml per kg of predicted body weight and 30 cmH2O.
Baby lung volume in ARDS is
variable with severity of disease, worse is the ARDS, smaller is the baby lung.
As baby lung has normal compliance, setting tidal volume according to predicted
body weight, may be safe to unsafe depending upon baby lung volume.
Lung behaves like viscoelastic
material, which makes pulmonary mechanics time dependent. For a constant tidal
volume, stress (transpulmonary pressure) increases with respiratory rate. In
other words, for a set tidal volume, transpulmonary pressure which is safe at
lower respiratory rate, may become unsafe at higher respiratory rate, thus
predisposing to VILI.
Thus, tidal volume per kg
predicted body weight, is not a reliable surrogate of lung stress-strain and
VILI.
As per the stress-strain
relationship of human lung, a transpulmonary pressure of 17 cmH2O
will inflate lung from functional residual capacity to total lung capacity, the
limit of structural damage. As baby lung is physiologically normal,
transpulmonary pressure of 17 cmH2O will increases its volume to the
limit, irrespective of its volume. But in ARDS, alveolar heterogeneity acts as
stress riser, multiplying global stress at regional level. Therefore, in ARDS,
critical transpulmonary pressure to develop VILI would be lower than 17 cmH2O.
Therefore, Safe strategy of
mechanical ventilation to prevent VILI in ARDS would be limitation of transpulmonary
pressure (stress) to less than 17 cmH2O.
Driving pressure is recently
proposed surrogate of transpulmonary pressure aimed at limitation of
transpulmonary pressure. In quantitative terms, driving pressure is plateau
pressure above PEEP.
Conceptually, driving pressure
strategy differs from currently practiced ARDS net, so that driving pressure
becomes the independent variable and tidal volume assumes the role of derived
variable.
In a recently published study in
NEJM, limiting driving pressure to less than 14 cmH2O predicted improved survival.
Though driving pressure concept seems promising, it is still to be subjected to
randomized controlled trials.
Precaution must be exercised in
interpreting driving pressure in patients with reduced chest wall compliance. As
driving pressure is the distending pressure of respiratory system, its relation
to transpulmonary pressure is dependent upon chest wall compliance. If chest
wall compliance is low, as in obesity, chest wall deformity or increased
intraabdominal pressure, a higher driving pressure would be needed to achieve
similar transpulmonary pressure, as in patient with normal chest wall
compliance.
Comments
Post a Comment