Skip to main content

End of Life Decision

Shared from Facebook page Learning Critical Care Medicine (posted on 18th May 2015).

" marte hain aarjoo me marne ki
  maut aati hai par nahi aati "
                - Mirza Ghalib

Aruna Shanbaug officially died today at KEM hospital Mumbai. She was in Permanent Vegetative State (PVS) for the last 42 years. During these years she had become a living skeleton, though she pulled through this long because of effort, love and care of her fellow nurses. She did not develop a single pressure sore.

Infrequently miss Shanbaug used to transform into news headlines as she became synonym for End of Life Care debate in India during last many years.

As there was no clear law regarding End of Life Decision ( EOLD) in India, public interest litigation was filed in 2009 in Supreme Court to relieve Aruna of her sufferings.

Court arrived to verdict in 2011, affirming that Aruna is in PVS. Decision to withdraw life support measures can be taken by parents/ spouse/ close relatives or in their absence surrogate decision maker (people taking care). However approval from concerned High Court has to be taken before proceeding with the decision.

But surrogate decision makers ( staff of KEM hospital) decided not to withdraw treatment, probably because of emotional factors.

End of Life Decision ( EOLD) does not translates to terminating life. EOLD means Right to Die with Dignity.

Right to live also encompasses right to death with dignity.

With the advent of life support machines coupled with advance knowledge, patients with critical illness and hopeless outcome are treated aggressively, prolonging the natural process of death. The gap between life and death has been blurred. Therefore the end result achieved is physical, emotional and financial suffering on the part of patient as well as relations. On the other hand scarce resources are wasted and potentially salvageable patients are denied bed.

EOLD  comprises of 3 different pathways. DNI/DNR (do not intubate/ do not resuscitate),  treatment Withholding and treatment Withdrawing. DNI means not putting endotracheal tube and invasive mechanical ventilation. DNR implies not doing CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) in the event of cardiac arrest. Not escalating existing treatment, if patient further deteriorates, is Withholding of treatment. Pulling off the life support measures is Withdrawing of treatment.

The soul of EOLD is ensuring that patient must not feel pain.

Also remember that EOLD does not mean that patient has to die. Purpose is to put a cap on futile treatment. It is possible that patient may not need the treatment/ intervention and may survive to home.

Who can decide EOLD:
Advance directive is patient decision to choose EOLD pathways. If there is no advance directive then surrogate decision makers can choose the pathway. Surrogate decision makers are parents/ spouce/ siblings/ other close relatives. If there are no relation, people taking care of the patient can decide.
There could be possibolity of malicious intention of relatives in approving for EOLD, which creates legal hurdle.
If relations are not willing for EOLD, treating physician can decide EOLD,  if they opine about futility of treatment ( weighing the treatment and probable outcome).

Again remember that there has to be clear legal provision regarding who can decide EOLD, if there is no advance directive.

Now certain terminologies which are no more used in EOLD.

Acive EUTHANASIA: providing patient some lethal drugs to end life, patient consumes/ injects himself. It is crime in most countries barring a few.

Passive EUTHANASIA: Not giving the needed treatment to prolong life. It is same as Withholding treatment.

PHYSICIAN ASSISTED SUICIDE: Physician himself provides patient the drug to end life. Crime in most countries barring a few.

Finally EOLD is not a new concept.

" first I will define what I conceive medicine to be.
In general terms, it is to do away with the sufferings of the sick,
To lessen the voilence of their disease,
And to REFUSE TO TREAT THOSE WHO ARE OVERWHELMED BY THEIR DISEASE,
realising that in such cases medicine is powerless"

                    --The Hippocratic Corpus

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FROM BICARBONATE TO STRONG ION DIFFERENCE- INTRIGUING STORY OF BLOOD ACID-BASE ANALYSIS   “Life is struggle, not against sin, not against money power…. but against Hydrogen ion.” - H.L. Mencken, 1919   Since the understanding of similarity between fermentation of wine and respiration of animals, evolution of human physiology and measurement of carbon dioxide is coupled with studies of acids and bases. Alkalinity of blood was demonstrated by color indicators as early as eighteenth century by French chemist Hilaire Marin Rouelle, and one century later, its relation with gastric acid secretion was recognized by Henry Bence Jones. In 1831, William B. O’Shaughnessy, an Irish physician working in India, demonstrated that Cholera reduced the free alkali of blood. But the discovery of relationship between blood alkalinity and carbon dioxide was contained within the mystery of diabetic coma.   1.     Story of Carbon Dioxide and Alkalinity of blood   In Nineteenth century clinicians were intrigu

Vocal Cord Dysfunction (VCD ) or PARADOXICAL VOCAL CORD MOVEMENT (PVCM)

▪Inappropriate adduction of true vocal cords, mostly during inspiration. This results in dyspnoea and strider during inspiration. Rarely it may happen during expiration also. ▪15 Y F presenting with acute respiratory distress for 48 hours. For the past 2 years she was on inhaled bronchodialtors and steroids with short cources of oral/IV steroids for bronchial asthma. There was history of 4 hospital admissions and several emergency visits for symptoms attributed to asthma. Examination revealed apprehensive, tachycardic, tachpnoic girl with accessory muscle use and widespread rhonchi bilaterally, SPO2 93% on room air. Other systemic examination were normal. She was started on inhalation therapy but her conditioned worsened. Oxygen saturation felled to 78% ON 10 L face mask,  ABG revealed pH 7.53, PaO2 58, PaCO2 28. She was intubated emergency and shifted TO ICU. She was treated as life threatening attack of bronchial asthma. She improved dramatically and successfully extubated in 48 h

REVERSE TRIGGERING: A newly classified though common form of double triggering

Reverse triggering is a recently defined type of double triggering where a controlled mechanical breath, stimulates receptors in the lung, eliciting inspiratory effort. Seen in patients who are deeply sedated with high mechanical ventilation rates. Reverse triggering could be explained by respiratory entrainment, a form of patient ventilator interaction, where diaphragmatic muscle contraction is triggered by ventilator insufflations, leading to breath initiation. Consequences of reverse triggering are large. Continuously induced muscle contraction of diaphragm cause cytokine release and muscle fibre damage. Additionally it increases inspiratory muscle load and oxygen consumption and may lead to cardiovascular instability. Reverse triggering also makes measurement of plateu pressure misleading as well as may generate high platue pressure and ventilator induced lung injury. Management is not entirely clear. Increasing sedation does not help. Increasing inspiratory time will cause the